But, as statesmen, even these better aristocrats were not much less remiss and shortsighted than the average senators of the time. In presence of an outward foe the more eminent among them, doubtless, proved themselves useful and brave; but no one of them evinced the desire or the skill to solve the problems of politics proper, and to guide the vessel of the state through the stormy sea of intrigues and factions as a true pilot. Their political wisdom was limited to a sincere belief in the oligarchy as the sole means of salvation, and to a cordial hatred and courageous execration of demagogism as well as of every individual authority which sought to emancipate itself. Their petty ambition was contented with little. -- Theodor Mommsen, History of Rome(the quote describes the political class of the Roman republic's last decades)
A century ago, Theodor Mommsen was globally renown for his history of the Roman republic. For some reason, the book pretty much went out of print around WWII and never came back. Which is unfortunate, for Mommsen's chronicles of the last decades of the republic are extremely relevant history for contemporary Americans. Remember, the Roman republic flourished from 500 BC to 50 BC, when it fell at the hands of Caesar. Of course today, if ever an American thinks of Rome, they undoubtedly think of Imperial Rome, the age of the emperors and its inglorious fall chronicled by Gibbon. Yet, Gibbon's history begins where Mommsen's ends. The fall of the Roman republic was well known to America's founders and its lessons well contemplated, for unlike Imperial Rome, the republic fell at the height of its economic and military power. By the end, Rome's politics were eminently corrupt and the weight of the empire they conquered collapsed the unique system of self-government they had created.
With most recent examples of the health care bill, the financial industry bill, the continued electoral buying and selling of our elected officials, and the growing ineptitude and corruption of our government agencies, the most recently reported the MMS, who are responsible for regulation of the oil industry, it is obvious for all care look, we are on the same path of the Roman republic. And just as Rome, our political class' petty ambition is content with little. Mommsen wrote history's cold verdict on the republic's fall:
With most recent examples of the health care bill, the financial industry bill, the continued electoral buying and selling of our elected officials, and the growing ineptitude and corruption of our government agencies, the most recently reported the MMS, who are responsible for regulation of the oil industry, it is obvious for all care look, we are on the same path of the Roman republic. And just as Rome, our political class' petty ambition is content with little. Mommsen wrote history's cold verdict on the republic's fall:
But, when a government cannot govern, it ceases to be legitimate, and whoever has the power has also the right to overthrow it. It is, no doubt, unhappily true that an incapable and flagitious government may for a long period trample under foot the welfare and honor of the land, before the men are found who are able and willing to wield against that government the formidable weapons of its own forging, and to evoke out of the moral revolt of the good and the distress of the many the revolution which is in such a case legitimate. But if the game attempted with the fortunes of nations may be a merry one and may be played perhaps for a long time without molestation, it is a treacherous game, which in its own time entraps the players; and no one then blames the axe, if it is laid to the root of the tree that bears such fruits. For the Roman oligarchy the time had now come.In his last years, Mommsen gave a series of lectures on Rome's early emperors, when asked why he didn't put them together in a book, he declared, "It's too depressing." The Roman republic's decline took course over seven decades, from the Gracchi, maybe the republic's last true reformers, to Caesar. The real question for us is, unlike the Romans, will we stand up and reform our unique system of self-government, that has provided so much to us all, or as Rome, will it simply succumb to a neo-Caesar. I've come to empathize a great deal more with the republic's last great defender, Cicero. I used to consider him completely politically inept, but over the years, through experience, I have developed a much greater sympathy for the environment in which he toiled. Cicero wrote,
Long before our time the customs of our ancestors molded admirable men, in turn these men upheld the ways and institutions of their forebears. Our age, however, inherited the Republic as if it were some beautiful painting of bygone ages, its colors already fading through great antiquity; and not only has our time neglected to freshen the colors of the picture, but we have failed to preserve its forms and outlines
I always think it somewhat unfair to blame Caesar for the fall of the Republic.
ReplyDeleteAfter the reforms of the Gracchi failed to create a workable, popular model, with land reform or Italian citizenship, Sulla destroyed the Republic with a completely unworkable strong Senate, the precedent of self-appointed dictatorship from the head of an Army, and, of course, a bloody reign of terror.
Caesar initiated the replacement of a Republic, which was inadequate to the demands of Empire, and incapable of organic self-repair, due, arguably, to all the scar tissue left by Sulla.
The American Right, at least since the Fall of Nixon, has demonstrated its strong sense of the American constitution (small 'c') as a strategic forum. From their relentless attack on civil liberties, from Miranda to Guantanamo, to their deft repeal of the Independent Prosecutor statute prior to W's reign, the Supreme Court's appointment of W, . . . well, you know the drill.
The American Left, such as it is, doesn't seem to have any Gracchi, or any ambition for, or even awareness of constitutional reform. Major small-c constitutional reforms, with a devastating impact, scarcely seem to register. The FCC reforms that promoted Media consolidation, for example, creating a monolithic corporate propaganda operation is probably as significant for the American Republic as Sulla's reforms of the Tribunate.
No Gracchi. No Caesar. But, the Right doesn't seem to need a Sulla.
That last quote in your article seems to describe the contemporary situation pretty well. However, the metaphor of a fading painting is not as apt today. Rather, the painting has been defaced by its enemies.
ReplyDelete